مدیریت تبلیغات و فروش

مدیریت تبلیغات و فروش

شناسایی و ارزیابی تلنگرها برای افزایش میل مصرف مواد غذایی سالم: رهیافت فراترکیب

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه تهران
2 پردیش کیش دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش: هدف این پژوهش، «شناسایی و ارزیابی تلنگرها جهت افزایش میل به مصرف مواد غذایی سالم با استفاده از رهیافت فراترکیب» بوده است.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از حیث روش‌شناسی، پژوهشی کیفی با رویکرد «فراترکیب» است که با استفاده از گام‌های 7 گانه روش «سندلوسکی و باروسو» (2007) انجام شد. اسناد علمی مورد نیاز از طریق جستجوی گسترده در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی بین‌المللی از جمله «اسکوپوس»، «ساینس‌دایرکت» و «گوگل اسکالر» و همچنین پایگاه‌های داخلی نظیر «مرکز اطلاعات علمی جهاد دانشگاهی» در بازه زمانی 2008 تا 2025 استخراج گردیدند. از میان 114 مقاله داخلی و خارجی یافت‌شده، پس از اعمال معیارهای ورود و خروج دقیق و بررسی کیفیت روش‌شناختی مقاله‌ها با استفاده از «برنامه مهارت‌های ارزیابی حیاتی»، در نهایت 78 سند برای کدگذاری، تحلیل و بررسی، گزینش شدند. جهت اطمینان از روایی و پایایی (اعتبارپذیری و قابلیت اعتماد) نتایج، از مدل پیشنهادی «لینکلن و گوبا» (1985) و روش بازبینی توسط خبرگان بهره گرفته شد.
یافته‌های پژوهش: در این پژوهش، پس از غربالگری نهایی ۷۸ مقاله مرتبط، فرآیند تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از تکنیک کدگذاری سه‌مرحله‌ای (باز، محوری و انتخابی) انجام شد. در طی فرآیند کدگذاری باز، مجموعاً ۵۷ کد اولیه استخراج گردید که این کدها طی تحلیل مقایسه‌ای و انتزاع مفاهیم، در قالب ۹ مفهوم (زیرمقوله) دسته‌بندی شدند. در نهایت، با تلفیق این مفاهیم، ۴ مقوله اصلی استخراج گردید که مدل مفهومی پژوهش را شکل می‌دهند. این مقوله‌ها عبارت‌اند از: «معماری انتخاب و محیط‌سازی» که با مفاهیمِ «مدیریت چیدمان و دسترسی»، «برجسته‌سازی دیداری» و «مدیریت موجودی و کمیت»، بر تغییرات ساختاری و فیزیکی محیطِ تصمیم‌گیری تمرکز دارد؛ «طراحی شناختی و اطلاعاتی» که از طریق مفاهیمِ «اطلاع‌رسانی تغذیه‌ای» و «فرایندهای شناختی و خود-تنظیمی»، بر نحوه درک، پردازش و واکنشِ ذهنی مصرف‌کننده تأثیر می‌گذارد؛ «تلنگرهای ارتباطی» که با بهره‌گیری از مفاهیمِ «هنجارهای اجتماعی و مرجعیت» و «ترغیب مستقیم و یادآوری»، رفتار را از طریق تعاملات اجتماعی و پیام‌های هدایت‌گر تعدیل می‌کند؛ و «تلنگرهای دیجیتال» که با استفاده از مفاهیمِ «رابط کاربری و پایش» و «تعامل هوشمند و شخصی‌سازی»، بهره‌گیری از ابزارهای نوین فناورانه را برای تسهیل تغییر رفتار به کار می‌گیرد.
نتیجه‌گیری: مدل مفهومی حاصل از این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که فرآیند «تلنگر تغذیه‌ای» صرفاً یک مداخله تک‌بعدی و مجزّا نیست، بلکه یک نظام چندبعدی است که از ادغام «معماری انتخاب و محیط‌سازی»، «طراحی شناختی و اطلاعاتی»، «تلنگرهای ارتباطی» و «تلنگرهای دیجیتال» شکل می‌گیرد. تحلیل یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که در حالی که مداخلاتِ مبتنی بر «معماری انتخاب و محیط‌سازی» به دلیل ملموس بودن، بیشترین کاربرد را در ادبیات داشته‌اند، ظهورِ قدرتمندِ «تلنگرهای دیجیتال» نشان‌دهنده گذارِ پارادایمِ مداخلات تغذیه‌ای از محیط‌های سنتی به سمت پلتفرم‌های تعاملی و هوشمند است. این یافته‌ها تأکید می‌کنند که اثربخشیِ پایدار در اصلاح رفتارهای تغذیه‌ای، نه در به‌کارگیریِ تک‌بعدی این ابزارها، بلکه در «هم‌افزاییِ ساختاریافته» میان این ۴ مقوله نهفته است؛ به‌طوری که سیاست‌گذاران می‌توانند با تلفیقِ «معماری انتخاب و محیط‌سازی» با «تلنگرهای دیجیتال»، «طراحی شناختی و اطلاعاتی» و «تلنگرهای ارتباطی»، مقاومت‌های رفتاری را به حداقل رسانده و گزینه‌های سالم را به «انتخاب پیش‌فرض» و مطلوب مصرف‌کننده تبدیل نمایند. در نهایت، این مدل، چارچوب نظری جامعی را برای طراحی مداخلات سیاست‌گذارانه در محیط‌های تغذیه‌ای فراهم می‌آورد و به مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران پیشنهاد می‌کند تا به جای اتکا به مشوق‌های صرفاً اقتصادی یا دستوری، به طراحی هوشمندانه محیط‌های انتخاب روی آورند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identification and Evaluation of Nudges for Increasing Healthy Food Consumption: A Meta-Synthesis Approach

نویسندگان English

mohsen nazari 1
zeinab zarepour 2
1 University of Tehran
2 Kish International Campus University of Tehran
چکیده English

Research Objective: This study aims to identify and evaluate nudge interventions to enhance the intention to consume healthy food through a meta-synthesis approach.
Methodology: This study adopts an applied perspective and a qualitative methodology based on the meta-synthesis approach, executed following the seven-step framework of Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). Relevant scholarly documents were retrieved through an extensive search across international databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, as well as national databases such as the Scientific Information Database (SID), covering the period from 2008 to 2025. From an initial pool of 114 national and international articles, 78 documents were ultimately selected for coding and analysis, following the application of rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria and a methodological quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). To ensure the trustworthiness (credibility and confirmability) of the findings, the framework proposed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) and expert review were employed.
Findings: In this research, following the final screening of 78 relevant articles, the data analysis process was conducted using a three-stage coding technique (open, axial, and selective). During the open coding process, a total of 57 initial codes were extracted; these codes were then classified into 9 concepts (sub-categories) through comparative analysis and conceptual abstraction. Ultimately, by integrating these concepts, 4 main categories were identified, forming the conceptual model of the research. These categories include: "Choice Architecture and Environmental Design," which focuses on structural and physical modifications to the decision-making environment through "layout and accessibility management," "visual salience," and "inventory and quantity management"; "Cognitive and Informational Design," which influences consumer perception, mental processing, and reactions via "nutritional information" and "cognitive processes and self-regulation"; "Communication Nudges," which adjusts behavior through social interactions and directive messages using "social norms and authority" and "direct persuasion and reminders"; and "Digital Nudges," which leverages modern technological tools to facilitate behavior change through "user interface and monitoring" and "intelligent interaction and personalization."
Conclusion: The conceptual model derived from this research indicates that the "nutritional nudge" process is not merely a one-dimensional, isolated intervention; rather, it is a multidimensional system formed by integrating "Choice Architecture and Environmental Design," "Cognitive and Informational Design," "Communication Nudges," and "Digital Nudges." The analysis of the findings suggests that while interventions based on "Choice Architecture and Environmental Design" have been most prevalent in the literature due to their tangibility, the powerful emergence of "Digital Nudges" signifies a paradigm shift in nutritional interventions from traditional environments toward interactive and intelligent platforms. These findings emphasize that sustainable effectiveness in modifying dietary behaviors lies not in the one-dimensional application of these tools, but in a "structured synergy" among these four categories. Policymakers can minimize behavioral resistance and transform healthy options into the consumer's "default choice" by integrating "Choice Architecture and Environmental Design" with "Digital Nudges," "Cognitive and Informational Design," and "Communication Nudges." Ultimately, this model provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for designing policy interventions in nutritional environments, suggesting that managers and policymakers should move beyond relying solely on economic or prescriptive incentives and instead adopt the intelligent design of choice environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Behavioral Economics
Choice Architecture
Consumer Behavior
Meta-synthesis
Nudge
1.     Abdpoor, H., Varahrami, V., & Heydari, K. (2025). Designing Nudges and Examining Their Effects on Household Electricity Consumption: A Case Study of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 11(1), 3. [in persian]
2.     Amiri, B., Jafarian, A., & Abdi, Z. (2024). Nudging towards sustainability: A comprehensive review of behavioral approaches to ecofriendly choice. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00618-3
3.     Asadollahi, M., Seyedjavadin, S. R., Nazari, M. (2024). Developing a framework for effective digital nudges in online shopping: A systematic literature review. Management Researches in Iran, 28(3), 179-208. [in persian]
4.     Asgari, H., & Pourali Mardan, M. (2024). The framing of information nudge and students effort: A behavioral economics approach. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 30(3), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.30.3.4 [in persian]
5.     Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). (2015). REP 427: Investing in hybrid securities: Explanations based on behavioural economics.
6.     Bains, K., DeMarco, N., Brauer, P., & Yi, S. (2021). Post-secondary food service manager perspectives on fruit and vegetable nudging strategies: Qualitative study. Current Developments in Nutrition, 5(9), nzab109. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab109
7.     Balsa, A., Noboa, C., & Triunfo, P. (2024). Nudging healthy food choices through e-messages in a supermarket. Health Economics, 33(8), 1705–1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4831
8.     Behavioural Insights Team. (2010). The first annual report. Cabinet Office.
9.     Behavioural Insights Unit. (2014). Understanding people, better outcomes: Behavioural insights in NSW. NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet.
10.  Cadario, R., & Chandon, P. (2020). Which healthy eating nudges work best? A meta-analysis of field experiments. Marketing Science, 39(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1128
11.  Chapman, L. E., Sadeghzadeh, C., Koutlas, M., Zimmer, C., & De Marco, M. (2019). Evaluation of three behavioural economics ‘nudges’ on grocery and convenience store sales of promoted nutritious foods. Public Health Nutrition, 22(17), 3250–3260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019001794
12.  Coucke, N., Vermeir, I., Slabbinck, H., & Van Kerckhove, A. (2019). Show me more! The influence of visibility on sustainable food choices. Foods, 8(6), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060186
13.  Dayan, E., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 333–342.
14.  De Vries, R., Bol, N., & van der Laan, N. (2025). “Just-in-time” but a bit delayed: Personalizing digital nudges for healthier online food choices. Appetite, 206, Article 107852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.107852
15.  Delaney, T., Yoong, S. L., Lamont, H., Lecathelinais, C., Wolfenden, L., Clinton-McHarg, T., Sutherland, R., & Wyse, R. (2022). The efficacy of a multi-strategy choice architecture intervention on improving the nutritional quality of high school students' lunch purchases from online canteens (Click & Crunch High Schools): A cluster randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), Article 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01362-5
16.  Ebert, P., & Freibichler, W. (2017). Nudge management: Applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0014-1
17.  El Majjodi, A., Starke, A., & Trattner, C. (2022). Nudging towards health? Examining the merits of nutrition labels and personalization in a recipe recommender system. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP '22), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503252.3531312
18.  Ensaff, H. (2021). A nudge in the right direction: The role of food choice architecture in changing populations' diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 80(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665120007983
19.  Friis, R., Skov, L. R., Olsen, A., Appleton, K. M., Saulais, L., & Mejean, C. (2017). Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0176028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176028
20.  Garnett, T. (2011). Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy, 36(1), S23–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10.010
21.  Gillebaart, M., Blom, S., De Boer, F., & De Ridder, D. (2023). Prompting vegetable purchases in the supermarket by an affordance nudge: Examining effectiveness and appreciation in a set of field experiments. Appetite, 184, 106526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106526
22.  Gonçalves, D., Coelho, P., Martinez, L. F., & Monteiro, P. (2021). Nudging consumers toward healthier food choices: A field study on the effect of social norms. Sustainability, 13(4), 1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041660
23.  Hamdi, N., Ellison, B., McCaffrey, J., & Jarick Metcalfe, J. (2020). Implementation of a multi-component school lunch environmental change intervention to improve child fruit and vegetable intake: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113971
24.  Harbers, M. C., Beulens, J. W. J., Rutters, F., de Boer, F., Gillebaart, M., Sluijs, I., & van der Schouw, Y. T. (2020). The effects of nudges on purchases, food choice, and energy intake or content of purchases in real-life food purchasing environments: A systematic review and evidence synthesis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00623-y
25.  Harbers, M., Middel, M., Stuber, J., Beulens, J. W., Rutters, F., & Van der Schouw, Y. T. (2021). Determinants of food choice and perceptions of supermarket-based nudging interventions among adults with low socioeconomic position: The SUPREME NUDGE project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116175
26.  Hertwig, R., Michie, S., West, R., & Reicher, S. (2025). Moving from nudging to boosting: Empowering behaviour change to address global challenges. Behavioural Public Policy, 9(4), 874–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2025.9
27.  Huitink, M., van der Lans, I. A., & van Trijp, H. C. (2020). Social norm nudges in supermarkets: Promoting healthy food choices. Appetite, 150, 104655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104655
28.  Hummel, D., & Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005
29.  Ivanković, V., & Moles, A. (2025). The inevitability argument for choice architecture and the evidence-based view. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2025.1
30.  Jesse, M., Jannach, D., & Gula, B. (2021). Digital nudging for online food choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 729589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729589
31.  Jia, J., Gombi-Vaca, M. F., Bliss Barsness, C., Peterson, H., Pratt, R., Wolfson, J., & Caspi, C. E. (2024). Effect of a Multicomponent Food Pantry Intervention in Client Subgroups. Nutrients, 16(6), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16060805
32.  Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
33.  Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
34.  Kantola, M., Kara, A., Lahti-Koski, M., & Luomala, H. (2025). The effect of nutrition label type and consumer characteristics on the identification of healthy foods in Finland. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 37(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2023.2267048
35.  Karolyova, D., Haider, I., Ratilla, M., Dohnalova, Z., Horak, M., & Buckova, M. (2023). The impact of a nudge intervention on healthy complementary food purchasing: An experiment from a Czech university canteen. Transformations in Business & Economics, 22(1), 260–279. http://www.transformations.knf.vu.lt/58/article/theip
36.  Kawa, C., Ianiro-Dahm, P. M., Nijhuis, J. F. H., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2022). Are you “nudgeable”? Factors affecting the acceptance of healthy eating nudges in a cafeteria setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074107
37.  Kay, E., Kemps, E., & Prichard, I. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of visual cues and primes for nudging consumption-related behaviours. Appetite, 206, 107813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107813
38.  Kongsbak, I., Skov, L. R., Nielsen, B. K., Ahlmann, F. K., Schaldemose, H., Atkinson, L., Wichmann, M., & Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2016). Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among male university students in an ad libitum buffet setting: A choice architectural nudge intervention. Food Quality and Preference, 49, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.12.006
39.  Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R., Basol, M., Berinsky, A. J., Betsch, C., Cook, J., Fazio, L. K., Geers, A. L., Guess, A. M., Maertens, R., Panizza, F., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Rathje, S., Reifler, J., & Wineburg, S. (2024). Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation. Max Planck Institute for Human Development. https://interventionstoolbox.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/
40.  Kraak, V. I., Englund, T., Misyak, S., & Serrano, E. L. (2017). A novel marketing mix and choice architecture framework to nudge restaurant customers toward healthy food environments to reduce obesity in the United States. Obesity Reviews, 18(8), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12553
41.  Langen, N., Ohlhausen, P., Steinmeier, F., Friedrich, S., Engelmann, T., Speck, M., Damerau, K., Bienge, K., Rohn, H., & Teitscheid, P. (2022). Nudges for more sustainable food choices in the out-of-home catering sector applied in real-world labs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180, Article 106167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106167
42.  Lemken, D., & Erhard, A. (2024). A choice architect’s guide to the (autonomous) galaxy: A systematic scoping review of nudge intrusiveness in food choices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03555-8
43.  Li, W., Song, C., Cui, Y., Ma, Y., Li, B., Chen, Z., Snider, P., Long, Y., Liu, A., & Galea, G. (2025). Can behavioural nudges promote reduced-salt dish orders on meal delivery apps? Public Health, 242, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.028
44.  Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
45.  Lindahl, T., & Linder, N. (2024). What factors influence choosing fish over meat among grocery shoppers? Insights from an unsuccessful nudge intervention. Ecological Economics, 224, Article 108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolec.2024.108297
46.  Lohmann, P. M., Gsottbauer, E., Farrington, J., et al. (2024). Choice architecture promotes sustainable choices in online food-delivery apps. PNAS Nexus, 3(10), pgae422. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae422
47.  Marcano-Olivier, M., Pearson, R., Ruparell, A., Horne, P. J., Viktor, S., & Erjavec, M. (2019). A low-cost behavioural nudge and choice architecture intervention targeting school lunches increases children’s consumption of fruit: A cluster randomised trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0773-x
48.  Mertens, S., Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2022). The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), e2107346118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107346118
49.  Metcalfe, J. J., Ellison, B., Hamdi, N., Richardson, R., & Prescott, M. P. (2020). A systematic review of school meal nudge interventions to improve youth food behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00983-y
50.  Michels, L., Ochmann, J., Schmitt, K., Laumer, S., & Tiefenbeck, V. (2023). Salience, transparency, and self-nudging: a digital nudge to promote healthier food product choices. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(6), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2023.2229787
51.  Mistura, M., Fetterly, N., Rhodes, R. E., Tomlin, D., & Naylor, P. J. (2019). Examining the efficacy of a ‘feasible’ nudge intervention to increase the purchase of vegetables by first year university students (17–19 years of age) in British Columbia: A pilot study. Nutrients, 11(8), 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081786
52.  Münscher, R., Vetter, M., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). A review and taxonomy of choice architecture techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2–3), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1906
53.  Murphy, M., Mensah, D., Mylona, E., & Oyebode, O. (2021). Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to promote healthy dietary choices in UK secondary school canteens: A qualitative study. BMC Research Notes, 14(1), 365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05778-3
54.  Nørnberg, T. R., Houlby, L., Skov, L. R., & Peréz-Cueto, F. J. A. (2016). Choice architecture interventions for increased vegetable intake and behaviour change in a school setting: A systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health, 136(3), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913915596017
55.  Otterbring, T., Thomassen, E., Øritsland, C. S., & Ares, G. (2025). Trying tongs and spoiling spoons: Effort nudges influence food consumption and may motivate healthier food decisions. Food Quality and Preference, 127, 105435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105435
56.  Pandey, S., Olsen, A., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., & Thomsen, M. (2023). Nudging toward sustainable food consumption at university canteens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 55(12), 894–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2023.09.006
57.  Pinel, H., Sesini, G., & Lozza, E. (2024). Nudges in workplace environments – A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 24(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000362
58.  Policastro, P., Palm, T., Schwartz, J. A., & Chapman, G. B. (2017). Targeted calorie message promotes healthy beverage consumption better than charity incentive. Obesity, 25(8), 1428–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21885
59.  Ramezanzadeh, A.M., Nazari, M. (2025). Identifying and prioritizing effective nudges for social acceptance of green electricity: a fuzzy Delphi study. System Engineering and Productivity, 5(4), 149-167. [in persian]
60.  Rantala, E., Vanhatalo, S., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., Pihlajamäki, J., Poutanen, K., Karhunen, L., & Absetz, P. (2023). Acceptability of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy behaviours. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17331-x
61.  Rantala, E., Vanhatalo, S., Valtanen, M., Lindström, J., Pihlajamäki, J., Poutanen, K., Absetz, P., & Karhunen, L. (2024). Effectiveness of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy eating and daily physical activity. BMC Public Health, 24, Article 939. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18482-1
62.  Rastegar, A., Moosakhani, M., Keshavarz, M. (2020). Greening in public organizations; Investigating the role of place attachment on employees' environmental behaviors with the mediating role of citizenship and recycling behaviors and green nudge. [in persian]
63.  Reijula, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). Self-nudging and the citizen choice architect. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.5
64.  Rozin, P., Scott, S., Dingley, M., Urbanek, J. K., Jiang, H., & Kaltenbach, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity I: Minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500001935
65.  Samson, A. (Ed.). (2023). The behavioral economics guide 2023. Retrieved from https://www.behavioraleconomics.com
66.  Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer publishing company Inc.
67.  Sapio, S., Caso, G., Annunziata, A., & Vecchio, R. (2024). Small changes, big impact: Reducing ultra-processed foods choices among low-income consumers with a swap nudge. Food Quality and Preference, 130, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105535
68.  Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
69.  Schomaker, J., Vriens, M., & Jarva, H. A. (2022). Healthy or not: Influencing attention to bias food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 96, Article 104384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104384
70.  Schulte, E. A., Winkler, G., Brombach, C., & Buyken, A. E. (2023). Choice architecture interventions promoting sustained healthier food choice and consumption by students in a secondary school setting: A systematic review of intervention studies. Public Health Nutrition, 26(9), 1989–2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001118
71.  Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (4th ed.). Free Press.
72.  Stuber, J. M., Beulens, J. W. J., Ayala, G. X., Crozier, S. R., Dijkstra, S. C., Lin, S.-F., Vogel, C., & Mackenbach, J. D. (2024). Can nudge interventions targeting healthy food purchases in real-world grocery stores reduce diet-related health disparities? A pooled analysis of four controlled trials. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21, Article 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01687-3
73.  Stuber, J. M., Lakerveld, J., Kievitsbosch, L. W., Mackenbach, J. D., & Beulens, J. W. J. (2022). Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 20(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02205-z
74.  Suleman, S., Sweeney-Magee, M., Pinkney, S., Charbonneau, K., Banh, K., Hale, I., & Amed, S. (2022). Evaluation of two social norms nudge interventions to promote healthier food choices in a Canadian grocery store. BMC Public Health, 22(1), Article 1946. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14370-8
75.  Tezçi, B., & Montanari, R. (2023). Unlocking the potential of nutrition labels: A look at the power of (digital) nudges. European Journal of Privacy Law and Technologies, 2023(Special Issue), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.57230/EJPLT222BT
76.  Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577
77.  Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
78.  Vaezi, S. K., & Mirza Abolalhassan Khan Ilchi, L. (1404). Identifying Nudge Based Behavioral Interventions Across Educational and Research Phases for Doctoral Students in Management. Educational Leadership and Management Research, 9(35), 187-223. [in persian]
79.  Valenčič, E., Beckett, E., Collins, C. E., et al. (2023). SnackTrack—An app-based tool to assess the influence of digital and physical environments on snack choice. Nutrients, 15(2), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020349
80.  Van der Vliet, N., Stuber, J. M., Raghoebar, S., Roordink, E., & van der Swaluw, K. (2024). Nudging plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy in a real-life online supermarket: A randomized controlled trial. Appetite, 196, Article 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107278
81.  van Gestel, L. C., Adriaanse, M. A., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (2020). Beyond discrete choices – Investigating the effectiveness of a proximity nudge with multiple alternative options. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01211
82.  Van Kleef, E., Seijdell, K., Vingerhoeds, M. H., de Wijk, R. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2018). The effect of a default-based nudge on the choice of whole wheat bread. Appetite, 121, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.091
83.  Van Rookhuijzen, M., & de Vet, E. (2021). Nudging healthy eating in Dutch sports canteens: A multi-method case study. Public Health Nutrition, 24(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020002013
84.  Vecchio, R., Cavallo, C., Del Giudice, T., Caso, G., & Cicia, G. (2023). Healthier food choices made easy: A nudging experiment in a restaurant targeting millennials. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 14(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v14i3.G1
85.  Venema, T. A. G., & Jensen, N. H. (2023). We meat again: A field study on the moderating role of location-specific consumer preferences in nudging vegetarian options. Psychology & Health, 39(10), 1337–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2182896
86.  Weijers, R. J., Claessens, I. W. H., Gillebaart, M., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (2024). Nudging towards sustainable dining: Exploring menu nudges to promote vegetarian meal choices in restaurants. Appetite, 198, 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107376
87.  Weingarten, N., Bach, L., Roosen, J., & Hartmann, M. (2024). Every step you take: Nudging animal welfare product purchases in a virtual supermarket. Appetite, 197, 107316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107316
88.  Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., & vom Brocke, J. (2016). Digital nudging. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(6), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0453-1
89.  Wilson, A. L., Buckley, E., Buckley, J. D., & Bogomolova, S. (2016). Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming: Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009
90.  Wyse, R., Delaney, T., Stacey, F., Lecathelinais, C., Ball, K., Zoetemeyer, R., Lamont, H., Sutherland, R., Nathan, N., Wiggers, J. H., & Wolfenden, L. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of a multistrategy behavioral intervention to increase the nutritional quality of primary school students' online lunch orders: 18-month follow-up of the Click & Crunch cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e31734. https://doi.org/10.2196/31734
91.  Yi, S., Kanetkar, V., & Brauer, P. (2023). Campus food service users' support for nudge strategies for fruit and vegetable-rich items: findings from a large Canadian national sample. Journal of Nutritional Science, 12, Article e93. https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.80
92. Zhang, A. W., Wharton, C., Cloonan, S., Boronowsky, R., Magesh, V., Braverman, I., Marquez, A., Leidy, H., Wang, M. C., Cleveland, D. A., Jay, J., & Stecher, C. (2024). Changing the default meal option at university events to reduce harmful environmental impacts: Six randomized controlled trials. Appetite, 200, 107572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107572