Journal of Advertising and Sales Management

Journal of Advertising and Sales Management

Exploring Common Mistakes in Marketing Research Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)

Authors
1 Marketing Management, Faculty of Management, Aras Int'l Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Marketing and Market Development Dept., Management, School of Management, University of Tehran.
Abstract
This study aims to identify and analyze common mistakes in marketing research and provide a comprehensive framework to improve research processes. Common mistakes can significantly affect the quality of research outcomes and ultimately influence managerial decision-making. The research is applied in purpose and descriptive in nature, employing a survey method with a questionnaire as the data collection tool. A three-stage mixed approach was used: first, a systematic review of reputable scientific sources was conducted to identify the main components of common mistakes in marketing research. Next, semi-structured interviews with experts in marketing management and research were conducted to validate and refine these components. Finally, the relationships between the components and their levels of influence were analyzed using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). The findings indicate that ambiguity in problem definition is the most significant factor leading to errors in marketing research. Other factors include errors in selecting the research approach, weaknesses in questionnaire design, failure to conduct pilot studies, and human and non-human errors in data analysis. The final model illustrates the interactions between these components and provides a precise ranking of their impact and dependencies. This study offers a useful tool for researchers and marketing managers to enhance research quality by identifying and preventing common mistakes. Using this model in future projects can lead to better solutions and more reliable results in marketing research.
Keywords

Subjects


Ab Rahman, A. F., Mahamod, Z., & Zainuddin, M. Z. (2022). 47 Years of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) as a Methodology: A Worldwide View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 12(5), 1673 – 1689.
Abdolmaleki, H. (2021). Prevalent Statistical and Methodological Errors of Sports Management Articles in Persian Publications. Sport Management Studies13(67), 170-201. (in Persian).
Aguinis, H., Bergh, D. & Molina-Azorin, J.F. (2023), Methodological challenges and insights for future international business research. J Int Bus Stud., 54, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00578-8
Attri, R. (2017), Interpretive structural modelling: a comprehensive literature review on applications, Int. J. Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 10, Nos. 3/4, pp.258–331.
Bromideh, Ali Akbar and Shahqolian, Hassan (2014), An introduction to some common mistakes in statistical analysis, Andiseh Amari, Year 9, Number 1, 31-33. (in Persian).
Dwan K.; Gamble C.; Williamson PR. And Kirkham JJ, (2013), The Reporting Bias Group Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias & Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLoS ONE, 8(7): e66844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
  Ford, J. (2018), Major Mistakes Made in Cross-Cultural Marketing Research, Projectics / Proyéctica / Projectique, 21, 13-21.
Hartley, R. & Claycomb, C., (2013), Marketing Mistakes and Successes, (12th ed). John Wiley & Sons.
Jabbari, M., & Talkhi, N. (2019), Common mistake in statistics, Paper presented at the First Congress in Inference of Evidence, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian).
Jennings, J. N.; Kim, J. M.; Lee, Joshua A.; & Taylor, D., (2024), Measurement Error, Fixed Effects, and False Positives in Accounting Research. Review of Accounting Studies, 29, 959-995. http://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-023-09754-z .
Kevin, B. & Zhang,  J. (2019) Critical Statistical and Methodological Issues in Sport Management Research, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 23:4, 291-300, DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2019.1684297
Kim, Y., & Lee, J. L. (2019) Common mistakes in statistical and methodological practices of sport management research. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 23(4), 314-324.
Li, Y., Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Wall, D. G., Johnson, E. J., Toubia, O., & Bartels, D. M. (2022). The More You Ask; the Less You Get: When Additional Questions Hurt External Validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(5), 963-982. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211073581
Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing research: An applied orientation, (7th ed.), Pearson. Global edition.
Malhotra, Naresh K.; Agarwal, James & Mark Peterson, (1996) Methodological issues in cross‐cultural marketing research: A state‐of‐the‐art review, International Marketing Review, Vol. 13 Iss: 5, pp.7 – 43. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50310
Morkunas, M., Rudienė, E., Giriūnas, L., & Daučiūnienė, L. (2020).  Assessment of Factors Causing Bias in Marketing- Related Publications, Publications, 8(4), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040045
Nassaji, H. (2017). Errors versus mistakes. In Nassaji, H. (Ed). The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, Grammar Teaching Volume, Wiley-Blackwell. 
Ohlson, James A., (2022). Researchers’ data analysis choices: an excess of false positives? Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09620-w
Sharopova, N.. (2023). Problems and solutions of marketing research in entrepreneurship and international business. Economics and Innovative Technologies, 11(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.55439/EIT/vol11_iss2/i32
Spilski A., Gröppel-Klein A., Gierl H. (2018). Avoiding pitfalls in experimental research in marketing, Marketing ZFP, 40(2), 58–90.
Valentin, E.K. (1994), Commentary: Marketing Research Pitfalls in Product Development, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 3 No. 4, 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429410073147.
Viglia, G., Zaefarian, G., & Ulqinaku, A. (2021). How to design good experiments in marketing: Types, examples, and methods. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.08.007
Wieczorkowska, G. & Krol, G. (2016). Ten Pitfalls of Research Practices in Management Science, Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(60), pages 173-187.
Zaefarian, G.; Kadile, V.; Henneberg, S.C.; & Leischnig, A. (2017), Endogeneity bias in marketing research: Problem, causes and remedies, Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 39–46.